MMPI-2 Narrative Report

36/63 Coded Profile, Female, Sensitization to the pain of humiliation

Caldwell Report


5839 Green Valley Circle

Suite 203

Culver City, CA 90230

TEL 310-670-2874

FAX 310-670-7907


January 31, 2008



NAME: Sample 36


AGE: 38


SEX: Female


EDUCATION: 12 years




REFERRED BY: -------


DATE TESTED: August 1, 2007


TEST ADMINISTERED: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2)





Attention and Comprehension: Attention and Comprehension: Her score on the Variable Response Inconsistency scale (VRIN) was quite unelevated; her item responses were highly self-consistent throughout the inventory. This suggests that she was clearly able to read and comprehend the test items, that she was attentive in considering her responses, and that she carefully matched the item numbers in the booklet to the corresponding numbers on the answer sheet. She does not appear to have had any difficulties in understanding the content or responding to the format of the inventory.


Attitude and Approach: She was extremely self-favorable in her approach to the inventory, covering over personal problems and minimizing weaknesses. Although the scores were extensively corrected for this understatement, the elevations may be distorted and incomplete. Considering just scales L, F,and K, the interpretive statements made are probably valid, but they may fail to fully reflect her level of disturbance.


She made almost no atypical and rarely given responses to the items in the second half of the inventory (scale F-back). This was consistent with the relative absence of such rare answers to the earlier MPI-2 items (scaleF). The profile clearly does not appear to be of questionable validity because of atypical responding.


Socio-cultural Influences vs. Conscious Distortion: The supplemental validity scales showed a high score on the scale (Ss) measuring her level of







Sample 36 Page 2


currently attained, recently experienced, or self-perceived socioeconomic status. She also showed a mild amount of conscious defensiveness. It appears that nearly all of her high elevation on scale K was due to genuinely higher class sophistication in her self-presentation, and only as mall to very small amount of her elevation on K was due an intentionally self-favorable slanting of her responses.





The profile suggests repressive and denying defenses with quite uneven insight and self-awareness. She would minimize shortcomings and limitations both in herself and others, righteously reacting as though everyone somehow were or ought to be much more virtuous than they are. Her outward composure and self-restraint would nevertheless be limited by a narrowly correct social etiquette. She would be quick to direct her attention and energy outwardly toward the problems of others rather than her own. It should be noted that some psychotherapy patients with related profiles were seen as more disturbed than their profile elevations suggested, apparently because of their abilities to agitate others around them in order to avoid subjective anguish and to defend against being seen as "mentally sick". Nevertheless, her personal coping and immediate practical self-sufficiency test as exceptionally well organized in a wide variety of areas.


What anxiety she experiences would come in brief and agitated episodes rather than as chronic worry. However, she would tend to deny and project,and at the time of testing she reported only a limited amount of anxiety and depression. She would strive to maintain an outward manner of composure and and imperturbability and of "being on top of things". Her relatively low level of depression predicts a general resiliency and ability to rebound quickly from stress. When threatened, her alertness and quick protectiveness toward anger directed at her could lead to preoccupations about the motives of and underlying intentions of others. At such times she would fixedly blame others and seek to externalize the focus of her conflicts away from herself.


The pattern suggests a potential for having reactions to somatic symptoms that others would see as more persistent and intense than medically expected if not at least partly psychological in origin. Typically her concerns would be neither severe nor incapacitating, and such briefly episodic complaints as gastrointestinal distress, headaches, and stiffness of the joints or joint pain would be characteristic. She would be seen as upset by and perhaps as overreacting to tangible but minor pains and physical distresses. If she became physically ill, she could find any prospect of a serious handicap of self-care or loss of self-control quite threatening. Her moral rigidity and inflexibility would strongly inhibit natural expressions of anger. This could derive from strong religious or ethical beliefs. At times she could "preach" her values and apply them in fixed "good-bad" judgments. Hostility toward members of her family and marital


Sample 36 Page 3


resentments would be denied and rationalized. The profile suggests strong needs to control her temper and possibly angry outbursts, but the rare expressions of anger that do occur are apt to be self-righteous and subtly punitive. In some cases the hostility was rigidly over controlled and temper was denied until it erupted in explosive outbursts, most often toward am ember of the patient's family. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that her conscience tests as well-integrated and strict and her interpersonal loyalties as generally stable and dependable.


Underlying conflicts and unreleased hurt feelings around sexuality are indicated. Some similar patients had periods in their histories of being quite active sexually, but this appeared to reflect the strength of their needs for positive emotional feelings around sexuality rather than any lack of conscience or deficit of internalized standards. In some cases sexual gratifications were strongly ego-emphasized despite the many inhibitions. Her interests and attitudes appear unusually masculine; esthetic sensitivities and abstract verbal pursuits would have little appeal to her. She could "dress well" with more than usual attention to her personal appearance and her attractiveness to the opposite sex.


Continuing self-control and careful avoidance of criticism are self-protective behaviors that would influence many aspects of her life style. Underneath this would be over learned but un verbalized fears lest she be attacked and be caused pain and humiliation by loved ones. The pattern suggests a public role of being cooperative and sociable with a strictly correct etiquette. In their past school histories, these patients were described as having been cooperative, reliable, and conscientious. Some had mothers who were described as "neurotic", but the patients’ needs to avoid shame and embarrassment had led to a strict covering over or minimizing of their resentments. Often one or both of their parents had been seen by Theo as moral and "upright"; in those cases where one parent was not very responsible or proper, the other typically presented a sharp contrast of rigid and puritanical attitudes. The relationships with their fathers were often described much more positively than their mother-daughter relationships, and some had been very boy-oriented in adolescence without close girl-to-girl relationships. Many had married "right out of high i school". As adults these patients became strongly "home oriented" and placed high values on having good and stable homes. Their marriages and home lives were marked by subtle power struggles around "proper family values". It should be re-emphasized that her profile is mostly within the normal range. If she currently is seriously stressed (e.g., marital strife, child custody litigation, threatening accusations, etc.), this would likely have increased the elevation of her profile. In this case, the kinds of childhood experiences just described may have been only occasional without severe or chronic impact, and she would have shown a relatively normal long-term adjustment in the absence of such stresses. Nevertheless, some elements of these childhood experiences are likely to have "set up" the behavioral tendencies being elicited by her current circumstances.» That is, the current profile would represent a fluctuating, stress-exacerbated rise in the level of her defenses.

Sample 36 Page 4




The profile suggests hysterical trends with a mixture of conversion, dissociate, and anxiety symptoms. Some similar patients showed paranoid trends clinically that they had rigidly covered over in responding to the test. Her profile is mostly within the normal range, however, and it is not diagnostically definitive. It may reflect no more than an adjustment disorder of adult life. Although her responses appear to have been influenced by a very high level of personal reserve and sophistication, the preceding diagnostic impression does not appear to be questionable because of any excessive effort to deliberately distort the test results in a self-favorable direction.




Contacts with family members or other informants could help to clarify what the current stresses are, what are the secondary gains from her symptoms, and how such gains can be minimized. Such contacts could also help to evaluate any covert paranoid trends such as unreasonable jealousies, temper outbursts, recent personality changes and increasingly fixed projections and blaming of others.


Psychotherapeutic intervention is difficult where the patient is so repressive, limited in insight, and rejecting of the idea that she may have a "mental illness". Her denial and her sensitive pride suggest many resistance's to intensive interviewing about intimate feelings and private reactions. She would emphasize external stresses and situations and would not want to be seen as emotionally disturbed. Motivation for treatment could be very situational, hesitant, and quick to subside. She could quickly reject treatment if she felt that her interpersonal role was being demeaned or that the therapist thought of her in any way at all as "crazy" or insane. The therapist should anticipate early requests for answers and advice which could come with an intention not to continue if unsatisfied. Seductiveness toward a male therapist would be likely at some point in therapy. This could develop at a time when she felt threatened and wanted to avoid an emotional pain such as her response to negative feedback from the therapist.


The profile anticipates that; in response to interview questions, she would be markedly understating if not highly sophisticatedly disguising of any personally upsetting or disruptive experiences. Any public occasions in the past when she seriously lost self-control, openly violated her own mora self-expectations, or felt judged by others to be "crazy" could have contributed to her vulnerability to shame. Her verbalizations of her emotions may be so finely modulated and her range of emotional intensity so narrow that it would be unusually hard for the interviewer to feel with her. The interviewer may have to "multiply" her statements in order to gain empathy for her. For example, the report that she is feeling "just a little bit" worse may be a serious upset and "a little bit better" a major improvement. In general her emotional constrictions and her tendency to

Sample 36 Page 5


declare certain topics "off limits“ could necessitate careful handling and patience in therapy. She may be specifically lacking in awareness as to how others perceive her behavior to be socially problematic. However fully self justified she feels, she may be paying needless prices for the ways in which others feel "put off" by her.


Marital misunderstandings and unreleased resentments are a likely focus of interviews with this profile. The profile suggests reflections of her emotional over control inviting catharsis, a gradual acceptance of angry feelings, and the development of new ways to express them. Even a mild ventilation of her repressed feelings would be an important initial step in treatment. Treatment experiences that would help to relieve her underlying fears of being caused pain by loved Ones and of any possibilities of hostile and humiliating attacks could be particularly helpful. Dealing with anger toward the therapist or toward members of a therapy group could be a very constructive process for her to work through. A longterm goal would be an increased acceptance of the intensity and directions of her own emotional reactions. It should be re-emphasized that the relative normality of her profile is a favorable prognostic sign.


Thank you for this referral.




       Alex B Caldwell, Ph.D.

Diplomate in Clinical Psychology

Sample 36 Page 6


The preceding analysis is basically actuarial and probabilistic in nature in that the symptoms and personality characteristics presented in the report have been identified as disproportionately frequent among individuals obtaining similar scores and patterns of scores on the MMPI-2 (tm). The diagnosis of any individual, however, needs to be based on the integration of information from personal contacts, the person's history, other test results, and whatever independent data are relevant and available.


This report has an overall focus on psychotherapy intake, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and related personality-dependent determinations. It provides assistance in the diagnostic process by providing an extended set of clinical hypotheses, the largest part of the basis for which is data from traditional psychiatric settings. The application of these hypotheses to an individual requires independent confirmation of them by the clinician and-an allowance for the specific context of testing if it differs substantially from the primarily psychotherapeutic database.


This report was prepared for our professional clientele. In most cases this is confidential information and legally privileged. The ongoing protection of this privilege becomes the responsibility of the professional person receiving the attached material from Caldwell Report.

Sample 36 Page 7




The following paragraphs present my current hypotheses as to etiologic and developmental factors that likely contribute to the behaviors associated with elevated and more severely disturbed profiles of the codetype to which this profile best conforms.» Thus, the following description characterizes relatively severe level of disturbance. Individuals with relatively unelevated profiles as in this case, typically show lower levels of sensitization and only selective aspects of this description. The adaptive responses to the aversive shaping experiences described below place demand son the attentional energies of the person, especially under threatening circumstances, but generally they are not overwhelmingly strong; at times of stress they are apt to interfere with day-to-day functioning but not to disrupt it grossly (which latter often does happen for individuals with markedly elevated profiles). THIS DESCRIPTION IN NOT MODIFIED OR ADJUSTED TO THE MILD LEVEL OF DISTURBANCE OR SECONDARY VARIATIONS OF THIS PERSON’SPROFILE: IT IS AN ETIOLOGIC PROTOTYPE FOR ANYONE WITH THIS GENERAL PATTERN TYPE. It is intended to generate hypotheses for clinical consideration as too how the individual "got this way". This prototypic material will always be the same for any profile matching this code type. About three fourths of the reports currently processed will have these paragraphs--the other fourth are more or less rarely occurring codes, and for want of code-specific data they will not have these paragraphs at this time.


My belief is that all behaviors are adaptive given the person's biologic/constitutional makeup and life experiences. An awareness facilitation benefits is potentially helpful: (1) in understanding the origins and adaptive self-protections of the person's present behaviors, (2)in providing test-result feedback to the client as well as in explaining the person's conduct to judges and any other parties appropriately involved, and(3) in guiding psychotherapeutic intervention. These inductive inferences are based on an extensive searching for developmental information on pattern-matched cases. Some interpretations are supported by published data (e.g.,Gilberstadt & Duker, 1965, Hathaway & Meehl, 1951, Marks & Seeman, 1963),and others are based on clinically examining any cases I have been able to access on whom pertinent information has been available. Your feedback tome will be much appreciated regarding: (1) whatever in the material that follows is clearly a misfit to this individual, (2) more precisely targeted word choices, phrasing, and especially the person's own words for crucial experiences, and (3) behavioral characteristics that are likely to generalize to the code type but are missing here. For everyone’s sake, don't hesitate to send me a note.


PROPOSED DIAGNOSIS: SENSITIZATION TO THE PAIN OF HUMILIATION ADAPTATION TO: being controlled by threat of personal and social humiliation



Sample 36 Page 8


PROTOTYPIC CHARACTERISTICS: strongly sensitive to criticism; follows strict ethical values that avoid being put down. Although acting so as to be seen as forgiving, they momentarily can become sharply critical of someone they perceive to have demeaned or insulted them. They usually are well-dressed and well-bathed, often very aware of physical presentation and attractiveness in self and others. This was the modal code in the early Hathaway and Monachesi adolescent research identifying high school girls who subsequently entered beauty queen contests, and the code is relatively often associated with physical beauty in women. In adult women for whom physical beauty or the consciousness of or pride in physical appearance become a too vital part of their identity, aging can be a very difficult transition(e.g., observe the avoid ant response of women clients with this syndrome to card 13F of the TAT). On limited data, it is my impression that 36/63 males like "nice" or more formal dress or possibly uniforms. As scales 1-Hs and 3Hy become elevated over T-65, they are likely to have a variety of physical complaints, e.g., headaches, fainting spells, or (almost specific to this pattern) joint pain--the latter probably from holding the body and limbs“too correctly".


Often they are achievement and self-advancement oriented; having acknowledge base that avoids being criticized as not well informed or embarrassed as ignorant can become quite important. The person is likely to be seen as strongly value-controlling in adult relationships, both as self-control and as a moral value-based control of others. For some this derives from strict religious values. Others may find the 36/63 person self»righteous: note whether the raw score on the "self-righteousness subscale" Pa3 is 7, 8, or all 9 items. In divorce and custody cases, for example, if one's spouse is perceived as humiliating or disgracing one in public, the proceedings are apt to become very painful and unforgiving.


CONTRIBUTORY SHAPING HISTORY: acute humiliations as a child, perhaps especially in front of family members, with illiteracies pressures to behave according to parental values and expectations in a "more mature" or "adult" way even at an early age. There can be an identity conflict of markedly contrasting parents, e.g., the father is impulsively self-gratifying and the mother is highly moralistic: "What does that make me--I come from both of them"? Past family tensions and resentments are covered over and evaded or denied in a vigilant avoidance of social embarrassments;this may be the sibling that most carefully opts to avoid public humiliation. The sensitivity to perceiving psychotherapy as a threatening engagement needs to be handled carefully.


For women, one of the attention-drawing consequences of beauty often seems to be experiences of male attention as the threat of an impersonal assault on her body, again a will-coercive threat (which is the major connection between 36/63 and beauty). Sexual histories often are active;private and mutually pursued and shared sexual affection is in many ways polar opposite to public harassment, humiliation by frustrated males, and their sexually motivated deceptions, hence sought-after intimacy is a desirable relief. The person (male or female) is likely to be sharply and

Sample 36 Page 9


self-protectively sensitive to honesty vs. dishonesty both in themselves and others; dichotomously, the other person may become either an always-trusted ally or has told a hurtful untruth and is therefore to be shut out or at least never completely trusted. Thus, life adaptation becomes the maintenance of a role that is "above criticism" while controlling others "for their own good".

NAME: Sample 36  
Distress & Depression  
Suicidal Thoughts  
Ideas of Reference, Persecution, and Delusions
Peculiar Experiences and Hallucinations
Sexual Difficulties  
Authority Problems  
Alcohol and Drugs  
Family Discord  
Somatic Concerns  
Aggressive Impulses  
Name:   Sample 36       Page 1 (MMPI-2)  
Referred by: ----------       Subscales    
Date Tested: 08/01/07            
2-D and Subscales     6-Pa and Subscales    
      RAW T     RAW T
D (full scale) 18 46 Pa (full scale) 12 56
D1 Subjective depression 3 39 Pal Persecutory ideas 0 39
D2 Indecision-retardation 5 46 Pa2 Poignant sensitivity 2 46
D3 Health pessimism 6 70 Pa3 Moral righteousness 8 65
D4 Mental dullness 1 43        
D5 Brooding, loss of hope 1 42        
3-Hy and Subscales     8-Sc and Subscales    
    RAW T     RAW T
Hy (full scale) 27 61 Sc (full scale) 3 55
Hyl Denies social anxiety 6 61 Scl Social alienation 0 38
Hy2 Need for affection 12 71 Sc2 Emotional alienation 1 49
Hy3 Lassitude – malaise 2 47 Sc3 Ego defect, cognitive 0 43
Hy4 Somatic complaints 1 41 SC4 Ego defect, conative 1 44
Hy5 Inhibits aggression 5 62 Sc5 Defective inhibition 1 46
        Sc6 Sensorimotor    
          Dissociation 1 45
4-Pd and Subscales     9-Ma and Subscales    
    RAW T     RAW T
Pd (full scale) 10 45 Ma (full scale) 16 53
Pdl Family discord 1 44 Mal Opportunism 2 54
Pd2 Authority problems 3 53 Ma2 Psychomotor    
Pd3 Social disinhibition 6 64   acceleration 4 45
Pd4 Social alienation 1 33 Ma3 Imperturbability 6 69
Pd5 Self-alienation 0 34 Ma4 Ego inflation 2 43
5-Mf and Subscales     0-Si and Subscales    
    RAW T     RAW T
Mf (full scale) 30 65 Si (full scale) 12 34
GM Gender masculine 40 68 Sil Shyness and    
GF Gender feminine 37 48   self-ccnscicusness 2 41
        Si2 Social avoidance 1 42
        Si3 Alienation -    
          self and others 0 38
Name: Sample 36    
Referred by: ----------    
Date Tested: 08/01/07    
Major Clinical Variables    
    RAW T
ES Ego strength 41 64
MAC-R Potential    
  Alcoholism 15 40
SAP Teen drugs/alcohol 7 46
AAS   0 39
Mr College maladjustment 5 40
N-P Neurotic-psychotic    
profile balance   59
Interpersonal Style Variables  
    RAW T
ER-S Ego resiliency 31 78
EC-5 Ego control 14 50
ORIG Need novelty 9 36
INT Abstract interests 59 65
Do Need for autonomy 18 56
Dy Need reassurances 4 34
Pr Intolerance 4 39
Re Value rigidity 24 59
Et Ethnocentrism 3 33
St Status mobility 17 48
R-S Repression-    
  Sensitization 10 36
Lbp Low back pain 9 50
O-H Overcontrolled    
  hostility 19 70
Ho Cynical hostility 5 35
Ba Good teamworker 49 58
    RAW T
A Level of distress 1 37
R Emotional    
  constriction 25 73
Ca Caudality-distress 1 34
Cn Control-facade 13 29
So-r Life as desirable 36 64
Th-r Tired housewife 5 35
Wb-r Worried breadwinner 10 44
PK PTSD 1 39
  Page 2 (MMPI-2)  
Validity & Stability    
    RAW T
VRIN Response inconsistency 1 34
TRIN T-F inconsistency 10 58T
F-back Rare answers – back 0 42
F(p) Psychiatric infrequency 2 57
S Superlative    
  self-presentation 42 70
Ds Overemphasize-fake sick 2 35
Mp Consciously fake good 12 61
Sd Consciously fake good 11 47
Ss SES identification 65 63
Ch Correction for H 5 34
Rc Retest-consistency 32 67
Ic Retest-item change 6 36
Tc Retest-score change 4 35
Content Scales    
    RAW T
HEA Health concerns 2 40
DEP Depression 1 39
FAM Family problems 2 39
ASP Antisocial practices 1 36
ANG Anger 0 31
CYN Cynicism 0 32
ANX Anxiety 3 43
OBS Obsessiveness 1 37
FRS Fears – Phobias 2 38
BIZ Bizarre mentation 0 39
LSE Low self-esteem 0 35
TPA Type A 2 36
SOD Social discomfort 2 39
WRK Work interference 4 43
TRT Negative treatment    
  Indicators 0 35




[Download this report pdf]Download
this report